D. Rashid Al-Shashani Here are the members of the Mecca Alliance confirming what we said about extending a hand to Iran and not confronting it, in an alliance whose members want to limit the scope of Washington’s exploitation of Iran’s threat to neighboring countries, but it seems that the alliance has become lost in its pursuit of such a goal, and it is meeting in Tehran in order to avoid the escalation of events, after Trump threatened a military strike, in which he resorted to brandishing the “Mother of All Bombs” considering that she is the judge. Should I conclude an agreement with the Iranians or eliminate them completely? So says Trump. You cannot do either of them, otherwise you would have done so a long time ago, so we say. Unintentionally; The wheels of Trump's interest turned towards moving the Mecca Pact countries and others. In the direction of making efforts that are not compatible with the interests of these countries on the one hand, and do not meet their aspirations on the other hand, they - that is, these countries - believed that Trump could end the matter with one blow, regardless of the form of this end, which some of them believe may establish a withdrawal in the face, but we do not see that events allow this at all. Trump himself fears this strike more than Iran itself and its neighboring countries. Concerning Trump: He knows very well that this is his last bullet, which he is likely to fire as a result of failure. He may add a picture or more of rock debris. Trump could repeat his talk more than a hundred times about destroying Iran's military capabilities, but these words of his; and his intelligence information; It is belied by his fears, and Israel's with him, regarding the renewal of this power, and the need to strike sites and capabilities, whose destruction we have forgotten how many times we mentioned. As for Iran, it also threatened - in the context of its fear and hedging - an unusual response. Trump and Netanyahu know that something like this will inevitably happen, not only in the form of attacks inside America and Europe, but also throughout Iran’s neighborhood. But in a different way; Do not leave Trump room to stop and wait, or to resort to a non-humiliating withdrawal. This situation; Nothing changes the outcome of the Washington elections, and also; Tel Aviv, which Trump began to use to exaggerate his threat of an airstrike to the Iranian border; Trump wanted it to magnify the threat of the mother of all bombs, and push Iran to concede by concluding a deal, which his military strikes would no longer force it to negotiate; Which means that Trump will lose one of the functions of his military strikes, leaving him with only one, which is the “decisive strike.” What comes after the mother of all bombs strike? This is the question that pushes Trump to be cautious and push the countries of the world to mediate, especially with the lack of a favorable opportunity to carry out a military operation on the ground, or at least an intelligence operation that can achieve a certain goal. We said previously that Al-Faisal in directing a strike like this; It is the realization of this opportunity, not any other considerations. This scary situation; It pushed the members of the Mecca Alliance to quickly avoid an Iranian threat that was not clear, driven by the idea that ground groups not supported by Iran could escape the attack. But it sends the command to move; As happened in Jordan recently, “Iran’s new strategy.” This is what prompted Hezbollah - with Iranian coordination - to announce its final position about not participating alongside Iran if it was exposed to a strike. But the American play leaves an open question on the arena of upcoming changes, which is: Will the Mecca Pact mediation go alongside the mediation of Qatar and Pakistan according to what is known, or does each of them have their own path moved by Washington using Pakistan as the leader of the reconnaissance faction?